✦Journal · Film

Is a fake review defamation of your restaurant company?

TS
TableSpark Editorial

Is a fake review defamation of your restaurant company? In England and Wales, harm to the reputation of a body that trades for profit is not serious harm under the Defamation Act 2013 unless it has caused or is likely to cause the body serious financial loss. Under section 5 and the 2013 Regulations, the website operator has 48 hours to forward a notice of complaint to the poster, who then has five days to respond; if the poster does not respond, the operator must remove the statement within 48 hours of the end of that period. Defamation claims carry a one-year limitation period. A summary of public law, not legal advice.

What the film covers

Read the full articleThe Legal Options for a Restaurant Hit by a False ReviewA false review costs bookings within days, and English defamation law sets a higher financial-loss bar for a company, a removal-only notice route, and two once-reliable offences repealed since January 2024. A one-star review goes up under the restaurant's own name on a Sunday night, and by Tuesday the booking diary for the following weekend is visibly thinner than it was the week before. The review is specific, and none of it happened: a member of staff is accused of being racist, a health inspection is invented outright, food poisoning is described as sending a table to A&E when no such table exists. It sits at the top of the search result for the restaurant's own name, above the menu and the phone number, read by everyone who searches that name before booking somewhere else instead. The owner asks around and gets five answers in one afternoon — sue them, get the platform to take it down, call the police, report it to Trading Standards, get a solicitor's letter out today — and each answer points at a different piece of law, most of them read by nobody who is giving the advice.